Keyword summary
78%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esas results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,779 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,854 of 37,536 keywords). This Esas is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Esas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Esas (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,779
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.8%21.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos