Keyword summary
74%3 analyzed articles/videos1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Burnett results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 7,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,586 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,809 of 37,536 keywords). This Erin Burnett is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Erin Burnett
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Erin Burnett (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,586
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.3%8.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate