Keyword summary
83%1 analyzed article/video476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Queathem results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,282 of 37,536 keywords). This Eric Queathem is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Eric Queathem
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Eric Queathem (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 14.9%14.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos