Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Survivors results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Tu Quoque , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,251 hits . Analysis detected 8,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,603 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (17,203 of 35,662 keywords). This Epstein Survivors is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Epstein Survivors
Keyword details
Total words: 6,603
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst