Keyword summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 1,977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Violations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 852 hits . Analysis detected 4,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,931 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,211 of 36,620 keywords). This Environmental Violations is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Environmental Violations
Keyword details
Total words: 5,931
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst