Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Environmental Safeguards results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,112 keywords). This Environmental Safeguards is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Environmental Safeguards
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Environmental Safeguards (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos