Keyword summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Engine Technology results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 274 hits . Analysis detected 1,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,329 of 37,536 keywords). This Engine Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Engine Technology
Keyword details
Total words: 1,407
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.8% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst