Keyword summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Consumption Tax results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Unattributed Quote , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 1,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,513 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,620 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Consumption Tax is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Energy Consumption Tax
Keyword details
Total words: 3,513
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst