Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endangered Habitats results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 816 hits. Analysis detected 4,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Endangered Habitats is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Endangered Habitats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Endangered Habitats (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,692
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.1%22.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos