Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These End Trump's Iran War results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 2,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This End Trump's Iran War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
End Trump's Iran War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%End Trump's Iran War (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos