Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emmy Nomination results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 2,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Emmy Nomination is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emmy Nomination
Keyword details
Total words: 2,980
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst