Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emerson Campus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,258 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,927 of 37,536 keywords). This Emerson Campus is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Emerson Campus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Emerson Campus (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,258
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos