Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Embers Of The Hands results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 606 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (2,105 of 37,536 keywords). This Embers Of The Hands is worse (more manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Embers Of The Hands
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠95%Embers Of The Hands (selected)10%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 606
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510094.4% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles606 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 30.9%30.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 26.7%26.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 26.7%26.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 13.4%13.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 15.8%15.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness HeuristicSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos