Keyword summary
76%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Embarrassing results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,667 of 37,536 keywords). This Embarrassing is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Embarrassing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Embarrassing (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos