Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,697 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emanuel Cleaver results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 1,214 hits . Analysis detected 5,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,788 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,997 of 37,536 keywords). This Emanuel Cleaver is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Emanuel Cleaver
Keyword details
Total words: 6,788
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst