Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Elliott Chelsea Houses results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 993 hits . Analysis detected 6,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,361 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,004 keywords). This Elliott Chelsea Houses is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Elliott Chelsea Houses
Keyword details
Total words: 8,361
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst