Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ella Fitzgerald results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 2,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,004 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,545 of 37,536 keywords). This Ella Fitzgerald is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Ella Fitzgerald
Keyword details
Total words: 6,004
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst