Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Macdonough results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 4,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,732 of 34,467 keywords). This Elizabeth Macdonough is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Macdonough
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
87%Elizabeth Macdonough (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,924
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.7%20.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 19.3%19.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.9%20.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 15.8%15.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 12.0%12.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos