Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electorate results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 3,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,009 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (18,947 of 37,536 keywords). This Electorate is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Electorate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠50%Electorate (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,009
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos