Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Tampering results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 504 hits . Analysis detected 3,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (26,484 of 36,698 keywords). This Election Tampering is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Election Tampering
Keyword details
Total words: 5,460
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst