Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Runoff results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 920 hits. Analysis detected 5,918 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,164 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Runoff is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Election Runoff
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
15%Election Runoff (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,904
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos