Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Election Reforms results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 978 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Reforms is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Election Reforms
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Election Reforms (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 978
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles978 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos