Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Integrity Army results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 75.1% saturation with 1,271 hits. Analysis detected 5,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,177 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Integrity Army is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Election Integrity Army
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
97%Election Integrity Army (selected)13%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,692
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

97% percentile
025507510096.9% percentile
12.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 75.1%75.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 51.9%51.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 48.5%48.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 17.9%17.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 75.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 51.9%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 48.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos