Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Election Debate results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 254 hits . Analysis detected 1,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,638 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Debate is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Election Debate
Keyword details
Total words: 1,638
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst