Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eduardo Soto results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 972 hits. Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,082 of 37,536 keywords). This Eduardo Soto is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Eduardo Soto
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Eduardo Soto (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 35.3%35.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Keyword 35.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos