Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eddie Greim results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 621 hits. Analysis detected 5,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,064 of 37,536 keywords). This Eddie Greim is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Eddie Greim
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
18%Eddie Greim (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,660
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate