Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eco Hysteria results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Straw Man, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 2,145 hits. Analysis detected 12,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,830 of 37,536 keywords). This Eco Hysteria is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Eco Hysteria
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Eco Hysteria (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 46.8%46.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 31.6%31.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 27.4%27.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 8.8%8.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 46.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 31.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos