Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Ebmud results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 808 hits . Analysis detected 3,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Ebmud is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ebmud
Keyword details
Total words: 4,704
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst