Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eben Pingree results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 863 hits . Analysis detected 4,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,220 of 37,536 keywords). This Eben Pingree is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Eben Pingree
Keyword details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst