Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These East Williamsburg results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 574 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,546 of 37,536 keywords). This East Williamsburg is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. East Williamsburg
Keyword details
Total words: 1,916
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst