Keyword summary
82%1 analyzed article/video748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dwarf Mongooses results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Composition/Division, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 451 hits. Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,563 of 35,675 keywords). This Dwarf Mongooses is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Dwarf Mongooses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Dwarf Mongooses (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos