Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dusty May results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 4,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,197 of 35,080 keywords). This Dusty May is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Dusty May
Keyword details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst