Keyword summary
28%2 analyzed articles/videos1,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Durham results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 2,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (38,795 of 55,217 keywords). This Durham is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Durham
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
30%Durham (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,000
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos