Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Durant results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 201 hits . Analysis detected 1,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,578 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,181 of 37,536 keywords). This Durant is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Durant
Keyword details
Total words: 1,578
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst