Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Draggan Mihailovich results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 2,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,304 keywords). This Draggan Mihailovich is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Draggan Mihailovich
Keyword details
Total words: 4,488
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst