Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Draft results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,705 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,701 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Draft is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Draft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Draft (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,701
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.6%14.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos