Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Z results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,566 hits . Analysis detected 3,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,878 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (24,770 of 55,130 keywords). This Dr Z is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Dr Z
Keyword details
Total words: 5,878
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 26.6% 26.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst