Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Downtown Los Angeles results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,741 hits . Analysis detected 10,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,001 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,164 of 37,536 keywords). This Downtown Los Angeles is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Downtown Los Angeles
Keyword details
Total words: 8,001
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst