Keyword summary
96%1 analyzed article/video562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dow Futures results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 3,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,686 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,156 of 37,536 keywords). This Dow Futures is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Dow Futures
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%Dow Futures (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,686
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510091.6% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 34.0%34.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 15.6%15.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.3%19.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 34.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos