Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Double Fine Productions results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 3,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,040 of 37,536 keywords). This Double Fine Productions is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Double Fine Productions
Keyword details
Total words: 3,920
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst