Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Doomerism results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 874 hits . Analysis detected 7,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,204 keywords). This Doomerism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Doomerism
Keyword details
Total words: 9,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst