Keyword summary
85%1 analyzed article/video660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominique Davis results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (19,017 of 55,047 keywords). This Dominique Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Dominique Davis
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
66%Dominique Davis (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos