Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominic Miller results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 598 hits . Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,398 of 37,536 keywords). This Dominic Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Dominic Miller
Keyword details
Total words: 1,479
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.9% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 39.0% 39.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 40.4% 40.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 40.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 39.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst