Keyword summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominic Foppoli results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Bandwagon, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 1,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (31,584 of 37,536 keywords). This Dominic Foppoli is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Dominic Foppoli
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠16%Dominic Foppoli (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos