Keyword summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers Season results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 72.3% saturation with 1,488 hits. Analysis detected 8,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,058 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of 98% (1,010 of 37,536 keywords). This Dodgers Season is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Dodgers Season
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
98%Dodgers Season (selected)14%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,058
Article count: 8
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

97% percentile
025507510097.3% percentile
13.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 72.3%72.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 60.8%60.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 42.4%42.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 31.3%31.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 31.6%31.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 27.5%27.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 27.4%27.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Keyword 72.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 60.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 42.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 31.6%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 31.3%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 27.5%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate