Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers Book results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 98.3% saturation with 230 hits . Analysis detected 1,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 234 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of 100% (71 of 37,536 keywords). This Dodgers Book is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Dodgers Book
Keyword details
Total words: 234
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.8% percentile 32.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles234 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 98.3% 98.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 59.0% 59.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 61.5% 61.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 50.9% 50.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 62.0% 62.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 45.3% 45.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 45.3% 45.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 38.0% 38.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 28.2% 28.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Framing Effect: Keyword 98.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 62.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 61.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 59.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 50.9%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 45.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 45.3%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 38.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 28.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 8.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst