Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodger Stadium results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 88.3% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 1,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 315 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of 100% (264 of 37,536 keywords). This Dodger Stadium is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Dodger Stadium
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Dodger Stadium (selected)23%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 315
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

99% percentile
025507510099.3% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles315 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 88.3%88.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 47.0%47.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 43.8%43.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 47.6%47.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 34.0%34.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Keyword 88.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 47.6%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 47.0%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 43.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 34.0%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos