Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Do No Harm results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 1,265 hits. Analysis detected 5,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,202 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,806 of 37,536 keywords). This Do No Harm is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Do No Harm
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
96%Do No Harm (selected)11%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,202
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 57.5%57.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 29.3%29.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 32.0%32.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 57.5%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 32.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos