Keyword summary
90%1 analyzed article/video1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Division results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 797 hits. Analysis detected 2,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,215 of 37,536 keywords). This Division is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Division
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
60%Division (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,231
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.7%24.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos