Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Director National Intelligence results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 531 hits . Analysis detected 2,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,319 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Director National Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Director National Intelligence
Keyword details
Total words: 2,319
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst